

So i think artists are catching on that it is futile to create art that attacks critics and commodity. That's what they want. They need that argument to be 2 sided in order for them to survive. But the artist doesn't really need the critic as much as they need us. We can manage to find ways to sell work for reasonable prices because the average person is more intelligent than you might think. They don't have to have someone tell them its significant for them to buy it. They'll buy it if they can find some significance to themselves. So rather than appealing to the critic, artists have begun to appeal to the public. Humor is extremely appealing and easily achieved by taking something familiar (relatable) and mashing it with an unexpected twist. It's simple, yet clever. And just because an idea is simple and easy to understand doesn't mean its viewed briefly and dismissed quickly. The more clever the twist or humorous the more people want to pass on the idea to others. Just look at facebook and the internet memes that everyone posts and re-posts. People like to laugh and share that laughter.
So the death of art criticism is perhaps a significant topic of discussion...but not for artists. That's for the critics to worry about. And that's what they love to do, talk and assert their opinions. But i'm just gonna go continue making art for the people about the people.
It's true..more and more the public is able to bypass the middle man or the authority source and reach their audience through their own means. There have been a lot of artists, other than street artists, who have been able to bypass the gallery system completely...but I can' t think of names off hand other than Andrea Zittel and Thomas Hirschorn's memorial to Otto Freundlich. He set up a memorial on the street to a german sculptor from WWII. Maybe you can set up a memorial to art criticism.
ReplyDelete